Do You Know JUST HOW MUCH You Are Worth To The Banks?

Find out more about the debt-service ratio that banks use to determine your capacity to consider loans. How many of you know how much you are well worth, in terms of loan value, to the banking institutions? Did you know you have a value to the banking institutions? My company Freemen recently completed a workshop to talk about with property investors and newbies on how to create their financial portfolios to receive millions from the lender. Students, young working adults, and even retirees worked out strategies and methods to generate properties worthy of RM1.8mil, or even up to RM6.5mil, into their portfolio!

To know how, let’s talk about your debt service percentage (DSR). It really is a calculation which banking institutions used to determine your capacity to consider loans versus the amount of money you make monthly. The DSR varies from bank or investment company to a bank or investment company, but the following is probably the most typical way many banks calculate these days.

If it is unable to make those payments, it pays a higher penalty interest. From the depositor’s perspective, the checkable deposit is payable on demand with a more modest interest or else, after a hold off, with reward interest over delay. Similar clauses can (and really should) connect with other demand or overnight debt instruments.

These would include right away repurchase agreements, overnight, commercial paper. With mutual funds, the management charge is higher if redeemability of stocks is maintained. While a choice clause is just about needed for the types of demand liabilities used as mass media of exchange, there are benefits to having such a clause for time debris too. For example, assume a bank or investment company is financing thirty 12 months mortgages with 3-month certificates of deposit.

• US exposure
• 2 Uses of the GDP deflator series
• Will ABC Widgets always be viable? ***cough coughing*** Enron! ***coughing*** MCI WorldCom
• Cowen Group [Current Openings]
• Web sites
• The furnishing of goods, services or facilities for money

The certificate of deposit could be due in 90 days at a lesser interest, but after some longer time frame, with a higher interest rate. Traditionally, the “option,” in the clause was the banker’s. When the banker decides he is in danger of default, he exercises the option and starts owing penalty interest until he can go back to making obligations on demand. However, it could be better if there was a provision for those by the end of the series also, including a deposit insurer (if such exists) to insist that the option is exercised. Presumably, insolvent banks would typically exercise the option clause.

While the penalty interest payments deepen the gap, what do they have to lose? Depositors would be trapped with funds in the insolvent institution while it undertakes various “go for broke” strategies. This brings up the second alternative to deposit insurance, one which would enter into play anytime a bank or investment company selects to exercise the choice clause.

Once the choice has been exercised, if any depositor asks, the bank should be at the mercy of an outside evaluation for solvency. If a bank or investment company is set to be insolvent, then it should be reorganized immediately. The principle should be that the existing stockholders get nothing and all of the bank’s creditors, including all the depositors, have a substantial “haircut” and receive shares of stock compared to their initial claims against the lender.

The bank or investment company is instantly recapitalized. The bank is now solvent. The deposits, still at the mercy of the exercised option, are paying bonus interest to the depositors. The depositors (and other lenders) are actually also the new owners of the bank. It would be smart for the new owners of the bank to market off most of the stock–it is simple diversification. And they can deposit the money they receive for the stock back to what now should be a solvent bank or investment company.

Since the lender was insolvent before the reorganization, the depositors would end up with a smaller balances than they had before typically. The bank would use the new deposits to fund the purchase of sound assets. Leaving some possible economy-wide lack of foundation money aside, the recently capitalized bank or investment company would receive the funds needed to resume payments and so go back to paying the lower, common interest on deposits.

Fixing the solvency problem would almost certainly correct any liquidity problem. You will find two thought experiments relevant to the option clause and fast reorganization approach. The first is a problem with an individual bank or investment company. An individual bank is at the mercy of a run, or perhaps some mismanagement that leaves it brief on reserve vault or balances cash.